<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1426 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778937</link>
    <description>ITAT, Mumbai (AT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding that CIT(A) had correctly computed Chapter VIA deduction at Rs. 44,282 but then wrongly added an ungranted excess deduction of Rs. 92,028 when determining total income. The Tribunal held no deduction of Rs. 92,028 was allowed in arriving at the Rs. 44,42,740 figure and directed the AO to delete the Rs. 92,028 addition after necessary verification. Appeal allowed subject to verification by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1426 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778937</link>
      <description>ITAT, Mumbai (AT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, finding that CIT(A) had correctly computed Chapter VIA deduction at Rs. 44,282 but then wrongly added an ungranted excess deduction of Rs. 92,028 when determining total income. The Tribunal held no deduction of Rs. 92,028 was allowed in arriving at the Rs. 44,42,740 figure and directed the AO to delete the Rs. 92,028 addition after necessary verification. Appeal allowed subject to verification by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>