<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 130 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46918</link>
    <description>An unclear excise rule and conflicting Tribunal views justified remand for fresh adjudication under law. The Court held that, in these circumstances, the Tribunal should reconsider the matter anew, and the connected questions were expressly left open. No final determination was made on the merits of the issues arising under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and the substantive controversy was returned to the Tribunal for fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 130 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46918</link>
      <description>An unclear excise rule and conflicting Tribunal views justified remand for fresh adjudication under law. The Court held that, in these circumstances, the Tribunal should reconsider the matter anew, and the connected questions were expressly left open. No final determination was made on the merits of the issues arising under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and the substantive controversy was returned to the Tribunal for fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>