<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778958</link>
    <description>HC held that the unexplained delay in filing and verifying Form 10BB (81 days) was satisfactorily attributed to the registered auditor&#039;s failure to prompt authorization on the e-filing portal. Although revenue had refused condonation and denied exemption under s.11 and s.10(23C)(vi), the court found that denying relief would cause grave hardship to the charitable educational institute and, on the facts, condoned the delay and upheld entitlement to the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1447 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778958</link>
      <description>HC held that the unexplained delay in filing and verifying Form 10BB (81 days) was satisfactorily attributed to the registered auditor&#039;s failure to prompt authorization on the e-filing portal. Although revenue had refused condonation and denied exemption under s.11 and s.10(23C)(vi), the court found that denying relief would cause grave hardship to the charitable educational institute and, on the facts, condoned the delay and upheld entitlement to the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>