https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778965 HC declined to make adverse observations against the petitioner's counsel after review of a challenge to cancellation of GST registration, noting the matter involves incorporation of fictitious firms and notarized affidavits executed without client contact, often facilitated by accountants/GST practitioners. The Court recorded similar findings in related matters and treated this case as another instance of such malpractice. The counsel disclosed referral details, so no further remarks were made against him; the order is to be communicated to the Standing Counsel and listed for further hearing. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778965 HC declined to make adverse observations against the petitioner's counsel after review of a challenge to cancellation of GST registration, noting the matter involves incorporation of fictitious firms and notarized affidavits executed without client contact, often facilitated by accountants/GST practitioners. The Court recorded similar findings in related matters and treated this case as another instance of such malpractice. The counsel disclosed referral details, so no further remarks were made against him; the order is to be communicated to the Standing Counsel and listed for further hearing. Case-Laws GST Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778965