https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778965 The Delhi High Court noted newly noticed material suggesting that the petitioner firm may be fictitious and that the stated proprietor may not be connected with the firm, but it did not finally adjudicate the review petition at that stage. The Court instead focused on securing the presence of the accountant who facilitated the filing, directing that he remain present on the next date. Service of the order was also directed through WhatsApp and the local police, indicating immediate steps to ensure attendance and assist further examination of the matter. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778965 The Delhi High Court noted newly noticed material suggesting that the petitioner firm may be fictitious and that the stated proprietor may not be connected with the firm, but it did not finally adjudicate the review petition at that stage. The Court instead focused on securing the presence of the accountant who facilitated the filing, directing that he remain present on the next date. Service of the order was also directed through WhatsApp and the local police, indicating immediate steps to ensure attendance and assist further examination of the matter. Case-Laws GST Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778965