<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1495 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463961</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT quashed the PCIT&#039;s revision under section 263, holding the revisionary exercise invalid. The Tribunal found the AO had issued a notice under section 142(1), examined the assessee&#039;s replies on dividends and share transactions (including long-term loss on penny stocks), and framed the assessment after enquiry. Relying on HC precedent, the Tribunal held a revision cannot be sustained merely on the AO&#039;s proposal where a detailed enquiry was conducted; appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 20:44:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1495 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463961</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT quashed the PCIT&#039;s revision under section 263, holding the revisionary exercise invalid. The Tribunal found the AO had issued a notice under section 142(1), examined the assessee&#039;s replies on dividends and share transactions (including long-term loss on penny stocks), and framed the assessment after enquiry. Relying on HC precedent, the Tribunal held a revision cannot be sustained merely on the AO&#039;s proposal where a detailed enquiry was conducted; appeal allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>