<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1468 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463966</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI remitted the s.14A disallowance to the AO for recomputation under r.8D(2)(iii) and deleted the corresponding s.115JB book-profit adjustment. The Tribunal upheld deletion/allowance of several assessments: s.80IA treatment (CENVAT credit not to vitiate eligible unit profits), corporate advertisement as revenue, lease equalization charges as allowable under AS-19, interest on electricity tax deductible under s.37 (not s.43B), and denial of reducing P&amp;M cost by investment incentives. TP guarantee fee at 0.5% was sustained. Refund/DTAA relief for DDT/education cess was rejected. Multiple other issues (subsidies, provisions, ESOP, catalyst capitalization, goodwill depreciation, carbon-credit receipts, TUF interest subsidy) were either allowed or remitted to the AO for factual examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 17:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1468 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463966</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI remitted the s.14A disallowance to the AO for recomputation under r.8D(2)(iii) and deleted the corresponding s.115JB book-profit adjustment. The Tribunal upheld deletion/allowance of several assessments: s.80IA treatment (CENVAT credit not to vitiate eligible unit profits), corporate advertisement as revenue, lease equalization charges as allowable under AS-19, interest on electricity tax deductible under s.37 (not s.43B), and denial of reducing P&amp;M cost by investment incentives. TP guarantee fee at 0.5% was sustained. Refund/DTAA relief for DDT/education cess was rejected. Multiple other issues (subsidies, provisions, ESOP, catalyst capitalization, goodwill depreciation, carbon-credit receipts, TUF interest subsidy) were either allowed or remitted to the AO for factual examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>