<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1696 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463967</link>
    <description>ITAT, Delhi (AT) held the reassessment void where no notice under s.143(2) was issued or record of issuance existed. Relying on HC and SC authorities, the Tribunal found s.292BB cannot cure non-issuance of a statutory notice (it only validates defective service), so absence of a s.143(2) notice fatally vitiated jurisdiction assumed under ss.147/143(3). The reassessment order was set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1696 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463967</link>
      <description>ITAT, Delhi (AT) held the reassessment void where no notice under s.143(2) was issued or record of issuance existed. Relying on HC and SC authorities, the Tribunal found s.292BB cannot cure non-issuance of a statutory notice (it only validates defective service), so absence of a s.143(2) notice fatally vitiated jurisdiction assumed under ss.147/143(3). The reassessment order was set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>