https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46900 A writ petition challenging an excise-related matter was dismissed because the petitioner had an alternative statutory appeal remedy before the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court kept all merits issues open, and noted that any delay in filing the appeal could be considered with reference to the pendency of the writ petition if the appeal was filed within one month. It also stated that any interim relief request before the Tribunal would be decided independently on its own merits. en-us Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:39:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46900 A writ petition challenging an excise-related matter was dismissed because the petitioner had an alternative statutory appeal remedy before the Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court kept all merits issues open, and noted that any delay in filing the appeal could be considered with reference to the pendency of the writ petition if the appeal was filed within one month. It also stated that any interim relief request before the Tribunal would be decided independently on its own merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46900