<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1397 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778908</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and held the assessee eligible for approval under clauses (i)-(v) of s.80G. The tribunal found the temple&#039;s activities - including annasantharpane feeding over 10,000 persons daily and open access for darshan without caste, creed or religion restrictions - amounted to general public utility within s.80G requirements. The observation of CIT(E) was rejected and CIT(E) was directed to grant approval under s.80G(5) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:16:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1397 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778908</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and held the assessee eligible for approval under clauses (i)-(v) of s.80G. The tribunal found the temple&#039;s activities - including annasantharpane feeding over 10,000 persons daily and open access for darshan without caste, creed or religion restrictions - amounted to general public utility within s.80G requirements. The observation of CIT(E) was rejected and CIT(E) was directed to grant approval under s.80G(5) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>