<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1395 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778906</link>
    <description>Additions under section 68 and on account of unexplained investment from accommodation entries were sustained because the assessee did not produce material to prove the identity of the creditors, the genuineness of the transactions, or the creditworthiness of the parties. In the absence of contrary evidence before the assessing or appellate authority, the findings confirming the additions were left undisturbed and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:16:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1395 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778906</link>
      <description>Additions under section 68 and on account of unexplained investment from accommodation entries were sustained because the assessee did not produce material to prove the identity of the creditors, the genuineness of the transactions, or the creditworthiness of the parties. In the absence of contrary evidence before the assessing or appellate authority, the findings confirming the additions were left undisturbed and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>