<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46894</link>
    <description>SC held that where a party itself admits certain items are parts of a water chilling plant and does not dispute their lack of independent use, the Department need not further prove that classification; admitted facts require no proof. The matter was remanded for appropriate action consistent with this principle. Decision rendered in favour of the revenue, affirming that the burden to prove does not extend to facts conceded by a party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46894</link>
      <description>SC held that where a party itself admits certain items are parts of a water chilling plant and does not dispute their lack of independent use, the Department need not further prove that classification; admitted facts require no proof. The matter was remanded for appropriate action consistent with this principle. Decision rendered in favour of the revenue, affirming that the burden to prove does not extend to facts conceded by a party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>