<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1343 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778854</link>
    <description>Termination of leave and licence arrangements was upheld where the agreements permitted one month&#039;s notice and the notice relied on sanctioned-plan use restrictions showing the upper floors were earmarked for car parking, not commercial use. The occupants&#039; objection that no separate proceedings were pursued by another authority did not defeat the Resolution Professional&#039;s contractual right to terminate and seek eviction. The direction to pay unpaid licence fee or occupation charges was also sustained as consequential relief for continued occupation after termination, even though that component was not separately framed as a prayer. The orders were affirmed, with time granted only for vacant handover and the security deposit to be adjusted against outstanding dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1343 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778854</link>
      <description>Termination of leave and licence arrangements was upheld where the agreements permitted one month&#039;s notice and the notice relied on sanctioned-plan use restrictions showing the upper floors were earmarked for car parking, not commercial use. The occupants&#039; objection that no separate proceedings were pursued by another authority did not defeat the Resolution Professional&#039;s contractual right to terminate and seek eviction. The direction to pay unpaid licence fee or occupation charges was also sustained as consequential relief for continued occupation after termination, even though that component was not separately framed as a prayer. The orders were affirmed, with time granted only for vacant handover and the security deposit to be adjusted against outstanding dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>