https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778862 HC dismissed the appeal and upheld the already-imposed Rs.10 lakh penalty on the respondent for facilitating procurement of broker documents, arranging airway bills in a fictitious name, and coordinating changes to consignor/consignee and goods description to match a false baggage declaration in connection with illegal export of Red Sanders. The Court declined to impose the additional penalty under s.114AA (which would be five times the goods' value) given the respondent's limited role, but left the legal question open for appropriate proceedings. en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778862 HC dismissed the appeal and upheld the already-imposed Rs.10 lakh penalty on the respondent for facilitating procurement of broker documents, arranging airway bills in a fictitious name, and coordinating changes to consignor/consignee and goods description to match a false baggage declaration in connection with illegal export of Red Sanders. The Court declined to impose the additional penalty under s.114AA (which would be five times the goods' value) given the respondent's limited role, but left the legal question open for appropriate proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778862