<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46889</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and setting aside the demand. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and principles of natural justice, requiring the service of a show cause notice and providing an opportunity to be heard before confirming any demand. The Petitioners were awarded costs, and the rule was made absolute in terms of prayer Clause 17(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:41:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 96 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46889</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and setting aside the demand. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory requirements and principles of natural justice, requiring the service of a show cause notice and providing an opportunity to be heard before confirming any demand. The Petitioners were awarded costs, and the rule was made absolute in terms of prayer Clause 17(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>