https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778865 HC held that CESTAT has jurisdiction to hear appeals on determination of anti-dumping duty under Section 9C, but the validity/effective date of amendments in the Finance Act, 2023 and the Central Government notification imposing duty raise a distinct dispute. The HC stayed CESTAT interim order No. 5.2025 dated 26.08.2025 insofar as it addresses the notification's validity, while permitting CESTAT to proceed with appeals limited to final findings of the designated authority. Notice issued; parties to file written submissions; matter listed for hearing on 24.11.2025. en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778865 HC held that CESTAT has jurisdiction to hear appeals on determination of anti-dumping duty under Section 9C, but the validity/effective date of amendments in the Finance Act, 2023 and the Central Government notification imposing duty raise a distinct dispute. The HC stayed CESTAT interim order No. 5.2025 dated 26.08.2025 insofar as it addresses the notification's validity, while permitting CESTAT to proceed with appeals limited to final findings of the designated authority. Notice issued; parties to file written submissions; matter listed for hearing on 24.11.2025. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778865