<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1357 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778868</link>
    <description>Belated show cause notices were treated as non-adjudicable on the principle of delay and laches, and relief had already been granted in similar matters to similarly placed assessees. Applying that approach, the Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the special leave petitions. The maintainability issue was therefore resolved against the revenue side in light of the delayed notice challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1357 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778868</link>
      <description>Belated show cause notices were treated as non-adjudicable on the principle of delay and laches, and relief had already been granted in similar matters to similarly placed assessees. Applying that approach, the Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the special leave petitions. The maintainability issue was therefore resolved against the revenue side in light of the delayed notice challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>