<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1358 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778869</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D was not sustainable where no exempt income was earned during the year, because the prevailing legal view treats section 14A as inapplicable in the absence of such income. The Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 2022 to section 14A was held to operate prospectively from 01.04.2022 and could not be applied to earlier assessment years. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1358 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778869</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D was not sustainable where no exempt income was earned during the year, because the prevailing legal view treats section 14A as inapplicable in the absence of such income. The Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 2022 to section 14A was held to operate prospectively from 01.04.2022 and could not be applied to earlier assessment years. The issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>