<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778875</link>
    <description>Reopening approval under section 151 of the Income-tax Act was found defective because the prescribed authority recorded only &quot;yes I am satisfied&quot;, which was treated as mechanical approval rather than application of mind. As the department did not rebut that factual position, the reassessment based on the sanction was invalid and could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1364 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778875</link>
      <description>Reopening approval under section 151 of the Income-tax Act was found defective because the prescribed authority recorded only &quot;yes I am satisfied&quot;, which was treated as mechanical approval rather than application of mind. As the department did not rebut that factual position, the reassessment based on the sanction was invalid and could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>