<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46886</link>
    <description>The High Court disagreed with the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision that no interest was chargeable under the Customs Act, 1962, regarding a company&#039;s failure to meet export obligations after importing raw materials. Despite finding interest chargeable as per the EXIM Policy, the Court ruled in favor of the company, stating they were not liable to pay interest. The Court set aside the Commission&#039;s stance on interest but upheld the order in other aspects, resolving the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46886</link>
      <description>The High Court disagreed with the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision that no interest was chargeable under the Customs Act, 1962, regarding a company&#039;s failure to meet export obligations after importing raw materials. Despite finding interest chargeable as per the EXIM Policy, the Court ruled in favor of the company, stating they were not liable to pay interest. The Court set aside the Commission&#039;s stance on interest but upheld the order in other aspects, resolving the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>