<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1386 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778897</link>
    <description>The HC found a breach of natural justice where the personal-hearing date was fixed before the deadline for submitting a reply and the impugned order was later passed without fresh notice, indicating non-application of mind and effectively an ex parte determination. The court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, directing it to afford a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing and to pass a reasoned, speaking order within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1386 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778897</link>
      <description>The HC found a breach of natural justice where the personal-hearing date was fixed before the deadline for submitting a reply and the impugned order was later passed without fresh notice, indicating non-application of mind and effectively an ex parte determination. The court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority, directing it to afford a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing and to pass a reasoned, speaking order within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>