<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal misread the import entitlement scheme by treating a passbook licence as requiring export obligation to be fulfilled in both quantity and value solely from the policy appendices; the governing question was whether the duty-free brass scrap was actually used in manufacture of the exported goods. Appendix 14-C was concerned only with certification for sensitive items, not with altering the underlying import entitlement, and the earlier authorities had not fully examined the assessee&#039;s evidence on actual utilisation and non-domestic disposal. The demand for customs duty could not be sustained without that factual inquiry, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal misread the import entitlement scheme by treating a passbook licence as requiring export obligation to be fulfilled in both quantity and value solely from the policy appendices; the governing question was whether the duty-free brass scrap was actually used in manufacture of the exported goods. Appendix 14-C was concerned only with certification for sensitive items, not with altering the underlying import entitlement, and the earlier authorities had not fully examined the assessee&#039;s evidence on actual utilisation and non-domestic disposal. The demand for customs duty could not be sustained without that factual inquiry, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>