https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=56628 The court stayed an Economic Offences Wing probe initiated on NHRC directions into aided madrassas and issued notice to the NHRC and complainant, on a petition arguing the NHRC acted without jurisdiction because the complaint omits the date of alleged violations and thus may breach the one year limitation under Section 36(2), and that none of the bases for inquiry in Section 12 A apply; respondents were directed to file replies within four weeks and a further hearing was scheduled. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:01:07 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:01:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=56628 The court stayed an Economic Offences Wing probe initiated on NHRC directions into aided madrassas and issued notice to the NHRC and complainant, on a petition arguing the NHRC acted without jurisdiction because the complaint omits the date of alleged violations and thus may breach the one year limitation under Section 36(2), and that none of the bases for inquiry in Section 12 A apply; respondents were directed to file replies within four weeks and a further hearing was scheduled. News - Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:01:07 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=56628