https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778850 The HC set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, holding that denial of the petitioner's request to cross-examine representatives of a third-party supplier-whose statements were recorded and relied upon-violated principles of natural justice. Because those statements were relevant and formed the basis for confirming the GST demand, refusal to permit cross-examination caused prejudice and warranted remand for rehearing in accordance with law, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to examine or impeach the veracity of the relied-upon statements. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:45:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778850 The HC set aside the impugned adjudication order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, holding that denial of the petitioner's request to cross-examine representatives of a third-party supplier-whose statements were recorded and relied upon-violated principles of natural justice. Because those statements were relevant and formed the basis for confirming the GST demand, refusal to permit cross-examination caused prejudice and warranted remand for rehearing in accordance with law, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to examine or impeach the veracity of the relied-upon statements. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778850