https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463933 Previous sanction under a penal ordinance is sufficient when it relates to the specific acts prosecuted and is duly authenticated under applicable business rules; no prescribed recital or proof of personal consideration in a particular form is required. The ordinance remained operative until repeal, and restrictions on property rights were treated as reasonable in the public interest during the emergency. A declaration denying benami ownership is false or partly false where the declarant is not the owner and knows the statement is untrue. Confiscation of property produced before a criminal court may be sustained where linked to the offence, absent illegality or jurisdictional error. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:50:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463933 Previous sanction under a penal ordinance is sufficient when it relates to the specific acts prosecuted and is duly authenticated under applicable business rules; no prescribed recital or proof of personal consideration in a particular form is required. The ordinance remained operative until repeal, and restrictions on property rights were treated as reasonable in the public interest during the emergency. A declaration denying benami ownership is false or partly false where the declarant is not the owner and knows the statement is untrue. Confiscation of property produced before a criminal court may be sustained where linked to the offence, absent illegality or jurisdictional error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463933