https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92765 ITAT quashed the PCIT's revisionary order under s.263 as beyond jurisdiction. The Tribunal held that revision cannot be predicated on an assessment under s.153A r/w s.143(3) which had been previously quashed for invalid s.153D approval, because doing so would unlawfully extend statutory limitation; a non-est order cannot be said to be erroneous or prejudicial. The AO's considered findings on excess stock (included in books) and on bad debts u/s 36(1)(vii) were not shown to be erroneous; PCIT failed to identify specific legal or factual errors or apply minds on merits. Applying sublato fundamentum cadit opus, the s.263 order was accordingly set aside. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:51 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92765 ITAT quashed the PCIT's revisionary order under s.263 as beyond jurisdiction. The Tribunal held that revision cannot be predicated on an assessment under s.153A r/w s.143(3) which had been previously quashed for invalid s.153D approval, because doing so would unlawfully extend statutory limitation; a non-est order cannot be said to be erroneous or prejudicial. The AO's considered findings on excess stock (included in books) and on bad debts u/s 36(1)(vii) were not shown to be erroneous; PCIT failed to identify specific legal or factual errors or apply minds on merits. Applying sublato fundamentum cadit opus, the s.263 order was accordingly set aside. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:51 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92765