<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1266 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778777</link>
    <description>The levy of entry tax on goods brought into a local area was not separately adjudicated because the Supreme Court treated the issue as covered by its earlier rulings in Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer v. State of Orissa. The appeals were dismissed on that basis, without fresh examination of the merits of the entry tax challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1266 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778777</link>
      <description>The levy of entry tax on goods brought into a local area was not separately adjudicated because the Supreme Court treated the issue as covered by its earlier rulings in Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Haryana and Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer v. State of Orissa. The appeals were dismissed on that basis, without fresh examination of the merits of the entry tax challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>