<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1271 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778782</link>
    <description>HC held that a pre-deposit must be refunded when an appellate authority remands the matter, and withholding it without valid reason entitles the appellant to statutory interest. The respondent failed to return the pre-deposit within three months of the remand order and paid only on 01/09/2005; HC awarded interest at 12% p.a. for the delay. Both legal questions were answered against the respondent and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1271 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778782</link>
      <description>HC held that a pre-deposit must be refunded when an appellate authority remands the matter, and withholding it without valid reason entitles the appellant to statutory interest. The respondent failed to return the pre-deposit within three months of the remand order and paid only on 01/09/2005; HC awarded interest at 12% p.a. for the delay. Both legal questions were answered against the respondent and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>