<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46864</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, holding that the notification dated 1-3-2001 was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The order dated 6-1-2003 was quashed, and the respondents were directed to extend the benefit of the concessional duty to the petitioners. The petitioners were also directed to file an application for the refund of the customs duty paid, which the respondents were to process within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:25:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 62 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46864</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, holding that the notification dated 1-3-2001 was discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. The order dated 6-1-2003 was quashed, and the respondents were directed to extend the benefit of the concessional duty to the petitioners. The petitioners were also directed to file an application for the refund of the customs duty paid, which the respondents were to process within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>