<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1276 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778787</link>
    <description>The HC held that services supplied on behalf of a foreign client and consumed in India nevertheless qualify for refund where (i) the service recipient is located outside India and (ii) payment is received in convertible foreign exchange. Applying the SC precedent, the court found those twin conditions satisfied for periods July-Sept 2008 and Apr-Sept 2009, answered the substantial questions of law in favour of the respondent-assessee, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1276 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778787</link>
      <description>The HC held that services supplied on behalf of a foreign client and consumed in India nevertheless qualify for refund where (i) the service recipient is located outside India and (ii) payment is received in convertible foreign exchange. Applying the SC precedent, the court found those twin conditions satisfied for periods July-Sept 2008 and Apr-Sept 2009, answered the substantial questions of law in favour of the respondent-assessee, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>