<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1279 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778790</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, refusing to interfere with the HC&#039;s order which held that offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 that correspond to offences listed in the PMLA Schedule as erstwhile IPC provisions are to be treated as scheduled offences for PMLA purposes. The court agreed that the absence of textual amendment to the Schedule does not bar prosecution so long as the new law covers the same field of criminality, and declined relief at this stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1279 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778790</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition, refusing to interfere with the HC&#039;s order which held that offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 that correspond to offences listed in the PMLA Schedule as erstwhile IPC provisions are to be treated as scheduled offences for PMLA purposes. The court agreed that the absence of textual amendment to the Schedule does not bar prosecution so long as the new law covers the same field of criminality, and declined relief at this stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>