<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1307 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778818</link>
    <description>ITAT (Ahmedabad) held that interest on fixed deposits was eligible for set-off against maintenance expenses as previously decided for the taxpayer in an earlier year; any surplus was already offered to tax in the return. Consequently, the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of such interest and the Commissioner&#039;s confirmation were unwarranted. The entire addition was deleted and the taxpayer&#039;s grounds were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1307 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778818</link>
      <description>ITAT (Ahmedabad) held that interest on fixed deposits was eligible for set-off against maintenance expenses as previously decided for the taxpayer in an earlier year; any surplus was already offered to tax in the return. Consequently, the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of such interest and the Commissioner&#039;s confirmation were unwarranted. The entire addition was deleted and the taxpayer&#039;s grounds were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>