<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778828</link>
    <description>HC set aside the final assessment order, the demand notice under s.156, the issue letter and the DRP order, and directed revival of the objections filed by the taxpayer before the DRP for fresh adjudication on merits. The Court noted the AO acted correctly in passing the final order once the taxpayer failed to inform the AO of filing objections with the DRP, and restricted relief to reopening the DRP process rather than permitting a fresh challenge to notices under ss.148A/148.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778828</link>
      <description>HC set aside the final assessment order, the demand notice under s.156, the issue letter and the DRP order, and directed revival of the objections filed by the taxpayer before the DRP for fresh adjudication on merits. The Court noted the AO acted correctly in passing the final order once the taxpayer failed to inform the AO of filing objections with the DRP, and restricted relief to reopening the DRP process rather than permitting a fresh challenge to notices under ss.148A/148.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>