<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 92 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46859</link>
    <description>Cotton based fabric laminates were classified under the tariff entry accepted by the Tribunal, and that classification was upheld because it was consistent with the Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Wood Polymers Ltd. The Tribunal&#039;s view on that item was therefore found correct. The separate issue concerning bearing blanks was not decided on the merits in this appeal, as it had already been remanded to the original authority and was not pursued further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 92 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46859</link>
      <description>Cotton based fabric laminates were classified under the tariff entry accepted by the Tribunal, and that classification was upheld because it was consistent with the Court&#039;s earlier ruling in Wood Polymers Ltd. The Tribunal&#039;s view on that item was therefore found correct. The separate issue concerning bearing blanks was not decided on the merits in this appeal, as it had already been remanded to the original authority and was not pursued further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>