<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1331 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778842</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST matter was declined because a statutory appeal remedy was available under Section 107 of the State GST law. The court reiterated that litigants should ordinarily exhaust the remedy provided by the statute before invoking writ jurisdiction, and found no sufficient ground to depart from that rule. The petition was therefore disposed of on the basis of the alternate statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1331 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778842</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST matter was declined because a statutory appeal remedy was available under Section 107 of the State GST law. The court reiterated that litigants should ordinarily exhaust the remedy provided by the statute before invoking writ jurisdiction, and found no sufficient ground to depart from that rule. The petition was therefore disposed of on the basis of the alternate statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>