https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778843 HC dismissed the writ petition and disposed the matter, holding the adjudication rejecting CENVAT credit (~Rs.9.34 crores for Apr-Jun 2017) to be an appealable order under Section 107 CGST Act. The court found no jurisdictional error or arbitrary exercise of power, noting the petitioner failed to produce requisite supporting documents beyond a CA certificate. Petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appeal and given time until 15 Nov 2025 to approach the Appellate Authority with the requisite pre-deposit. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:29:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778843 HC dismissed the writ petition and disposed the matter, holding the adjudication rejecting CENVAT credit (~Rs.9.34 crores for Apr-Jun 2017) to be an appealable order under Section 107 CGST Act. The court found no jurisdictional error or arbitrary exercise of power, noting the petitioner failed to produce requisite supporting documents beyond a CA certificate. Petitioner was permitted to pursue the statutory appeal and given time until 15 Nov 2025 to approach the Appellate Authority with the requisite pre-deposit. Case-Laws GST Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778843