<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1399 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463915</link>
    <description>Bail was granted to a petitioner who had remained in custody for over a year, after charge sheets were filed in both matters but cognizance had not yet been taken. The Court considered that investigation could still continue against co-accused, along with the nature of the alleged offences and the period of incarceration already undergone, and found release on bail justified. Bail was therefore allowed in both cases, subject to strict terms and conditions to be fixed by the Trial Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:28:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1399 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463915</link>
      <description>Bail was granted to a petitioner who had remained in custody for over a year, after charge sheets were filed in both matters but cognizance had not yet been taken. The Court considered that investigation could still continue against co-accused, along with the nature of the alleged offences and the period of incarceration already undergone, and found release on bail justified. Bail was therefore allowed in both cases, subject to strict terms and conditions to be fixed by the Trial Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>