https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46851 A writ court will not interfere under Articles 226 and 227 with an appellate order imposing a conditional pre-deposit where the authority has considered both the prima facie merits and the financial hardship pleaded, and has exercised discretion reasonably. The Karnataka HC treated the direction to deposit part of the demand as a reasoned exercise of appellate discretion rather than an infirm order. The challenge to the pre-deposit requirement therefore failed, and the writ petitions were rejected, with the appeal to be disposed of expeditiously after deposit of the specified amount. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46851 A writ court will not interfere under Articles 226 and 227 with an appellate order imposing a conditional pre-deposit where the authority has considered both the prima facie merits and the financial hardship pleaded, and has exercised discretion reasonably. The Karnataka HC treated the direction to deposit part of the demand as a reasoned exercise of appellate discretion rather than an infirm order. The challenge to the pre-deposit requirement therefore failed, and the writ petitions were rejected, with the appeal to be disposed of expeditiously after deposit of the specified amount. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46851