<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Important cases heard by Supreme Court on Monday</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=56528</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed multiple interlocutory criminal and administrative matters, including pending bail applications under UAPA, seeking police response on petitions by activists in an alleged conspiracy case linked to communal unrest. It criticized selective public release of a preliminary aviation safety report as creating a prejudicial media narrative. The court examined whether investigative agencies complied with directions in a probe into allegedly adulterated religious offerings, declined interference in a challenge over endowment land use for an exhibition, listed for hearing pleas on withdrawal of consent to investigate alleged disproportionate assets, deferred a petition on university selection panel membership pending a judge&#039;s report, and refused to quash an ECIR in a money laundering investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=853702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Important cases heard by Supreme Court on Monday</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=56528</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed multiple interlocutory criminal and administrative matters, including pending bail applications under UAPA, seeking police response on petitions by activists in an alleged conspiracy case linked to communal unrest. It criticized selective public release of a preliminary aviation safety report as creating a prejudicial media narrative. The court examined whether investigative agencies complied with directions in a probe into allegedly adulterated religious offerings, declined interference in a challenge over endowment land use for an exhibition, listed for hearing pleas on withdrawal of consent to investigate alleged disproportionate assets, deferred a petition on university selection panel membership pending a judge&#039;s report, and refused to quash an ECIR in a money laundering investigation.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=56528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>