<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 159 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46850</link>
    <description>Coercive recovery on the basis of an adjudication order should not continue while an assessee&#039;s stay application remains pending before the appellate authority. The appellate forum must decide the stay request, and enforcement should not be allowed to proceed merely because the adjudication order is under appeal. The writ court&#039;s refusal to grant relief was set aside, and protection from recovery was affirmed until disposal of the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 159 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46850</link>
      <description>Coercive recovery on the basis of an adjudication order should not continue while an assessee&#039;s stay application remains pending before the appellate authority. The appellate forum must decide the stay request, and enforcement should not be allowed to proceed merely because the adjudication order is under appeal. The writ court&#039;s refusal to grant relief was set aside, and protection from recovery was affirmed until disposal of the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>