<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 173 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46848</link>
    <description>Excise duty on seven electric overhead travelling cranes fabricated by the assessee at the work site for its own use was found unsustainable because the same issue had already been upheld in earlier proceedings between the same parties and that ruling was treated as fully covering the present dispute. On that basis, the levy could not be maintained and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 173 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46848</link>
      <description>Excise duty on seven electric overhead travelling cranes fabricated by the assessee at the work site for its own use was found unsustainable because the same issue had already been upheld in earlier proceedings between the same parties and that ruling was treated as fully covering the present dispute. On that basis, the levy could not be maintained and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>