<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 98 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46844</link>
    <description>The HC declared Circular No. 433/66/98-CX.6 ultra vires, quashing it for violating Section 37B of the Central Excise Act and constitutional Articles 14, 19, and 265. The circular&#039;s attempt to reclassify fusible interlining cloth under Chapter Heading 59.03 was deemed illegal, as it exceeded the Board&#039;s authority and contravened statutory provisions. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 98 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46844</link>
      <description>The HC declared Circular No. 433/66/98-CX.6 ultra vires, quashing it for violating Section 37B of the Central Excise Act and constitutional Articles 14, 19, and 265. The circular&#039;s attempt to reclassify fusible interlining cloth under Chapter Heading 59.03 was deemed illegal, as it exceeded the Board&#039;s authority and contravened statutory provisions. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>