<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 132 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46834</link>
    <description>Limitation for recovery of port charges under Section 58 of the Major Port Trusts Act begins when the Port Trust&#039;s right to sue accrues after it loses control over the goods. Confiscation by customs authorities constitutes juridical removal of goods from the Port Trust&#039;s control, crystallising the right to recover rates or demurrage. Where the confiscation order is not communicated on the date it is made, Article 113 of the Limitation Act runs from actual or constructive communication of that order. The recovery suit was therefore within limitation; the contrary trial court view was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:48:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 132 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46834</link>
      <description>Limitation for recovery of port charges under Section 58 of the Major Port Trusts Act begins when the Port Trust&#039;s right to sue accrues after it loses control over the goods. Confiscation by customs authorities constitutes juridical removal of goods from the Port Trust&#039;s control, crystallising the right to recover rates or demurrage. Where the confiscation order is not communicated on the date it is made, Article 113 of the Limitation Act runs from actual or constructive communication of that order. The recovery suit was therefore within limitation; the contrary trial court view was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>