<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46817</link>
    <description>Port Trust circulars limiting destuffing to two consignments at a time were treated as internal policy instructions to prevent dock congestion, not as statutory notifications requiring publication under Section 132 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The petitioner failed to show that the policy was illegal, irrational, or procedurally defective, and the request for destuffing was made substantially after the consignments had been received. The limited one-time remission arrangement invoked by the petitioner did not apply to these consignments, so the challenge to the circulars failed and remission of demurrage charges was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 125 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46817</link>
      <description>Port Trust circulars limiting destuffing to two consignments at a time were treated as internal policy instructions to prevent dock congestion, not as statutory notifications requiring publication under Section 132 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. The petitioner failed to show that the policy was illegal, irrational, or procedurally defective, and the request for destuffing was made substantially after the consignments had been received. The limited one-time remission arrangement invoked by the petitioner did not apply to these consignments, so the challenge to the circulars failed and remission of demurrage charges was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>