https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46814 A question of law was identified on the applicability of Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 where annual capacity had been re-determined under Rule 4(2) because of a change in parameters, even though the revised capacity was below the annual production for 1996-97. On that basis, the High Court directed the Tribunal to draw up and refer the statement of the case for its opinion. The operative effect was that the legal issue was sent for reference rather than decided finally at this stage. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:51:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46814 A question of law was identified on the applicability of Rule 5 of the Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 where annual capacity had been re-determined under Rule 4(2) because of a change in parameters, even though the revised capacity was below the annual production for 1996-97. On that basis, the High Court directed the Tribunal to draw up and refer the statement of the case for its opinion. The operative effect was that the legal issue was sent for reference rather than decided finally at this stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46814