https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46806 Article 22(5) requires an effective representation considered with expedition; a representation addressed to the President or Governor may, in principle, satisfy the constitutional scheme, but a detenu who follows a different route from that indicated in the detention order without explaining the departure may create avoidable delay. Preventive detention of a person already in custody is not invalid per se if the detaining authority knows of the custody, has reliable material showing a real possibility of bail, and records necessity to prevent prejudicial activity after release. The commentary also stresses that preventive detention review remains strict, yet the facts, the detenu's conduct, and the detention period already undergone may affect interference. en-us Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46806 Article 22(5) requires an effective representation considered with expedition; a representation addressed to the President or Governor may, in principle, satisfy the constitutional scheme, but a detenu who follows a different route from that indicated in the detention order without explaining the departure may create avoidable delay. Preventive detention of a person already in custody is not invalid per se if the detaining authority knows of the custody, has reliable material showing a real possibility of bail, and records necessity to prevent prejudicial activity after release. The commentary also stresses that preventive detention review remains strict, yet the facts, the detenu's conduct, and the detention period already undergone may affect interference. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46806