<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46789</link>
    <description>Under the special capacity-based levy scheme for textile processors, the treatment of galleries attached to a stenter turns on whether the attached installation functions as &quot;other equipment&quot; for computing annual production capacity. The clarification said such galleries were to be counted if they aided heat setting or drying, but the Tribunal had already held that a gallery without rails, fan or radiator could not by itself fall within that expression. The operative principle is that subordinate excise authorities must follow the Tribunal&#039;s ruling unless it is stayed, and they cannot apply a contrary clarification while making assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:48:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 100 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46789</link>
      <description>Under the special capacity-based levy scheme for textile processors, the treatment of galleries attached to a stenter turns on whether the attached installation functions as &quot;other equipment&quot; for computing annual production capacity. The clarification said such galleries were to be counted if they aided heat setting or drying, but the Tribunal had already held that a gallery without rails, fan or radiator could not by itself fall within that expression. The operative principle is that subordinate excise authorities must follow the Tribunal&#039;s ruling unless it is stayed, and they cannot apply a contrary clarification while making assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>