https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46785 The High Court of Delhi declined to interfere with the Tribunal's discretion to refuse interim relief on the basis of financial hardship, holding that the petitioner's admitted turnover and very low net profit share did not provide a reliable basis for equitable intervention. The Court also noted that the petitioner had not approached the Court with clean hands, which weighed against granting discretionary relief. On that factual foundation, the Court found no reason to disturb the Tribunal's decision and vacated the interim order. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:33:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46785 The High Court of Delhi declined to interfere with the Tribunal's discretion to refuse interim relief on the basis of financial hardship, holding that the petitioner's admitted turnover and very low net profit share did not provide a reliable basis for equitable intervention. The Court also noted that the petitioner had not approached the Court with clean hands, which weighed against granting discretionary relief. On that factual foundation, the Court found no reason to disturb the Tribunal's decision and vacated the interim order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46785