<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 131 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46783</link>
    <description>Laminated plastic films and poly papers used only to test the performance of fully manufactured form fill and seal machines were not treated as &quot;inputs&quot; under Rule 57A. The court reasoned that Modvat credit was available only for goods used in or in relation to manufacture, and manufacture ends when a new and marketable product comes into existence under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. Because the materials were used after completion of manufacture, merely for inspection, trial, tuning, or demonstration before despatch, they did not form part of the manufacturing process or of the finished machine. Credit was therefore not admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 131 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46783</link>
      <description>Laminated plastic films and poly papers used only to test the performance of fully manufactured form fill and seal machines were not treated as &quot;inputs&quot; under Rule 57A. The court reasoned that Modvat credit was available only for goods used in or in relation to manufacture, and manufacture ends when a new and marketable product comes into existence under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. Because the materials were used after completion of manufacture, merely for inspection, trial, tuning, or demonstration before despatch, they did not form part of the manufacturing process or of the finished machine. Credit was therefore not admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>