<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46781</link>
    <description>A writ court should not ordinarily quash or stay a pre-adjudicatory show cause notice where statutory remedies remain available after final adjudication. The High Court declined to interfere with the notice for recovery of duty and penalty, directed the assessee to file its reply before the Assistant Commissioner and place the earlier relied-upon order on record, and required expeditious adjudication within two months of receipt of the reply. Statutory remedies were preserved if the decision ultimately went against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46781</link>
      <description>A writ court should not ordinarily quash or stay a pre-adjudicatory show cause notice where statutory remedies remain available after final adjudication. The High Court declined to interfere with the notice for recovery of duty and penalty, directed the assessee to file its reply before the Assistant Commissioner and place the earlier relied-upon order on record, and required expeditious adjudication within two months of receipt of the reply. Statutory remedies were preserved if the decision ultimately went against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>