https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46772 The Court recalled the interim order issued on 7th February, 2003, due to the petitioner's deliberate non-disclosure of the respondent's prior Writ Petition seeking release of impugned currency. Emphasizing the importance of full disclosure in legal proceedings, the Court held that obtaining orders through fraud or concealment of material facts constitutes an abuse of the legal process. The judgment highlighted that suppression of material facts can lead to the denial of discretionary relief, ultimately resulting in the revocation of the interim order. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 15th July, 2003. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46772 The Court recalled the interim order issued on 7th February, 2003, due to the petitioner's deliberate non-disclosure of the respondent's prior Writ Petition seeking release of impugned currency. Emphasizing the importance of full disclosure in legal proceedings, the Court held that obtaining orders through fraud or concealment of material facts constitutes an abuse of the legal process. The judgment highlighted that suppression of material facts can lead to the denial of discretionary relief, ultimately resulting in the revocation of the interim order. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 15th July, 2003. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46772